For MVZs · Geschäftsführung & Verwaltung

Every location.
The same standard.

Each location misses different codes, in different ways, and no report shows you where. meda reviews every location the same way, and every approved code stays traceable to its note.

meda · Practice overviewSample data
128codes suggested this week
97approved by doctors
14open for review
Standort NordReview complete
Standort Mitte4 open for review
Standort SüdReview complete

Runs where you already work — 6 PVS connected

tomedo medatixx T2med CGM MEDISTAR TURBOMED M1 PRO

One engine · one surface per role

MFADrafted, pre-sorted suggestions land in an inbox. The chasing stops; the clearing starts.
DoctorsOne-click adjudication. The decision and the signature stay with the doctor. The hunting doesn't.
Billing teamExceptions instead of transcription. More Standorte per billing colleague.
MVZ-Leitung & CFOBilling completeness per Standort, visible in one overview.

Your billing team stops transcribing and starts reviewing. Same team, more locations — and the billing becomes complete.

What multi location billing actually looks like

Every location misses differently

Different teams, different habits, different gaps. The codes that slip in Nord are not the ones that slip in Süd.

No report shows you where

The PVS reports what was billed. It cannot report what was documented and never billed. That number does not exist today.

Growth raises the stakes

More locations means more billing volume under review. Consistency and traceability stop being nice to have.

Two colleagues at one screen

What meda changes

One review. One overview. Every site.

Above the PVS each site already uses. No migration, and doctors keep documenting exactly as before.

One overview

Suggested, approved and open, per location and per week.

Same review everywhere

Read the notes, suggest the codes, doctors approve. Identical at every site.

Audit ready by design

Every approved code stays traceable to its note and diagnosis. Billing, ready for audit.

No workflow change

Doctors document as before. The review takes about ten minutes a day, by design.

What you can tell your doctors

Three sentences, in their language — forward them as they are.

meda writes the documentation from the consultation and suggests billing codes it can support from it.
Every suggestion shows the sentence in your note that supports it, and you decide: bill, reject, unsure. Nothing is billed without you.
Nothing goes back without a doctor's approval, and your rejections count — meda is measured on what doctors approve, not on what it suggests.

MVZ questions

Our locations run different PVS systems. Does that work?

That is the point of the layer above. meda is live in 6 PVS today, with more on the way. Each location keeps its system.

How does rollout across locations work?

Nothing is installed at the practice. Locations are independent — bringing one online doesn't touch the others. Setup is scoped per organisation, and we do that work with you.

Do our doctors have to change how they document?

No. meda writes the documentation from the consultation. The only new thing is a short end of day review.

What does our ärztliche Leitung need to know?

Three things. Clinical judgment stays where it is: every code is decided by the treating doctor, and nothing changes in how anyone documents. The suggestions are evidence, not instructions — each one shows the note line it rests on. And the rules we build by are public: the meda Kodex.

What happens at a §106d Plausibilitätsprüfung?

Every approved code stays linked to its note and the supporting ICD‑10‑GM diagnosis, at every location. When the KV asks, the answer is one click. Complete billing, ready for audit, is the whole point. More on Security.

Want every location billing complete — without new headcount?

A 30 minute call shows the overview on your locations, on the PVS you already run.

Book a call